USA v. Morron
| California Southern District Court | |
| Case #: | 3:21-mj-00059 |
| Case Filed: | Jan 11, 2021 |
| Last checked: Tuesday Jan 12, 2021 11:32 PM PST |
|
Defendant
Melissa Jo Morron (1)
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
USA
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 01/12/2021 11:47 PM PST |
| Friday, January 08, 2021 | ||
| Arrest of Melissa Jo Morron (no document attached) (aef) | ||
| Monday, January 11, 2021 | ||
| 1 | 1
COMPLAINT as to Melissa Jo Morron.(aef)
|
|
|
Att: 1
Info Sheet
|
||
| 2 | 2
MOTION for Extension of Time to Indict and Continue Preliminary Hearing by USA as to Melissa Jo Morron. (aef)
|
|
| 3 | 3
ORDER and Findings of Fact as to Melissa Jo Morron (1). Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 1/5/2021.(aef)
|
|
| 4 | 4 Set/Reset Duty Hearings as to Melissa Jo Morron: Initial Appearance set for 1/11/2021 before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. (no document attached) (mxn) | |
| 6 | 6 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt: Initial Appearance as to Melissa Jo Morron held on 1/11/2021. Defendant consents to VTC. The Court accepts oral proffer and confirms the appointment of counsel. Appointed Attorney Federal Defenders for Melissa Jo Morron. Government oral motion to detain (Flight). ( Detention Hearing - RF set for 1/19/2021 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard.)( Preliminary Hearing set for 1/22/2021 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. Arraignment set for 2/4/2021 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard.) **Counsel please note the change in judge for future scheduled hearings*** (CD# 1/11/2021 JLB 21-1:3:24-3:30). (Plaintiff Attorney Sarah Akhtar AUSA). (Defendant Attorney Elana Fogel FD-S/A). (aje) | |
| 7 | 7 ***English. No Interpreter needed as to Melissa Jo Morron (no document attached) (aje) | |
| 8 | 8 Oral MOTION to Detain (Flight) by USA as to Melissa Jo Morron. (no document attached) (aje) | |
| 9 | 9
ORDER as to Melissa Jo Morron: The Court orders the United States to comply with the continuing duty to disclose evidence which is favorable to the defendant as required by Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. Upon finding that the government has failed to comply with this order, the Court may, as appropriate, order the production of such information, grant a continuance, impose evidentiary sanctions, or, in extreme cases, dismiss charges. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt on 1/11/21. (aje)
|
|