USA v. McNeil
| Arizona District Court | |
| Case #: | 4:22-cr-00457 |
| Case Filed: | Mar 16, 2022 |
| Last checked: Saturday Mar 19, 2022 12:27 AM MST |
|
Defendant
Logan Paul McNeil (1)
|
Represented By
|
|
Plaintiff
USA
|
Represented By
|
| TERMINATED PARTIES | |
|
Material Witness
Material Witness
Terminated: 03/16/2022
|
Represented By
|
| Docket last updated: 03/19/2022 1:16 AM MST |
| Wednesday, February 16, 2022 | ||
| Arrest of Logan Paul McNeil on 2/16/2022. (CAB) [4:22-mj-04277-N/A-MSA] | ||
| Thursday, February 17, 2022 | ||
| 1 | 1
|
|
| Friday, February 18, 2022 | ||
| 2 | 2
|
|
| 3 | 3 ORDER: Under federal law, including Rule 5(f) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and all applicable decisions from the Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit interpreting Brady , the government has a continuing obligation to produce all information or evidence known to the government relating to guilt or punishment that might reasonably be considered favorable to the defendant's case, even if the evidence is not admissible so long as it is reasonably likely to lead to admissible evidence. See United States v. Price , 566 F.3d 900,913 n.14 (9th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, the court orders the government to produce to the defendant in a timely manner all such information or evidence. Information or evidence may be favorable to a defendant's case if it either may help bolster the defendant's case or impeach a prosecutor's witness or other government evidence. If doubt exists, it should be resolved in favor of the defendant with full disclosure being made. If the government believes that a required disclosure would compromise witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other substantial government interest, the government may apply to the Court for a modification of the requirements of this Disclosure Order, which may include in camera review and/or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of the information. This Disclosure Order is entered under Rule 5(f) and does not relieve any party in this matter of any other discovery obligation. The consequences for violating either this Disclosure Order or the government's obligations under Brady include, but are not limited to, the following: contempt, sanction, referral to a disciplinary authority, adverse jury instruction, exclusion of evidence, and dismissal of charges. Nothing in this Disclosure Order enlarges or diminishes the government's obligation to disclose information and evidence to a defendant under Brady , as interpreted and applied under Supreme Court and Ninth Circuit precedent. As the Supreme Court noted, "the government violates the Constitution's Due Process Clause 'if it withholds evidence that is favorable to the defense and material to the defendant's guilt or punishment." ' Turner v. United States , 137 S. Ct. 1885, 1888 (2017), quoting Smith v. Cain , 565 U.S. 73, 75 (2012). Ordered by Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera.(CAB)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) [4:22-mj-04277-N/A-MSA] | |
| 4 | 4
|
|
| 5 | 5
|
|
| 7 | 7 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera: Initial Appearance as to Logan Paul McNeil held on 2/18/2022. The Court takes judicial notice of the Pretrial Services' report, finds the Defendant indigent, and appoints CJA attorney, Stephanie Bond as counsel for Defendant. Defendant, after consultation with counsel has consented to appear by VTC this date. Under Criminal Rule 5(f), the Government is ordered to comply with its disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland and related cases. Failure to do so may result in sanctions. Appointing Stephanie Kathryn Bond for Logan Paul McNeil with Appointment Type: CJA. Defendant states true name to be the same. Pretrial Services recommends detention pending residential treatment assessment; Government concurs. Defense counsel argues for release or in the alternative, for Pretrial Services to assess Defendant for residential treatment. Pretrial Services is directed to assess Defendant for residential treatment. Defendant is advised of the date and time of Material Witness Video Deposition. Government's motion for detention and request for continuance of the Detention Hearing is granted. Defendant is temporarily detained in the custody of the U.S. Marshal. The Preliminary Hearing is waived. Finding: Defendant held to answer before District Court. The Magistrate case referral is Judge Aguilera. Interpreter required for Logan Paul McNeil (1) N/A-English. Appearances : AUSA, Michael Lizano, attorney on duty for the Government; CJA Attorney, Stephanie Bond for Defendant. Defendant is present via VTC and in custody. Interpreter N/A. Detention Hearing set for 3/4/2022 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich. Hearing held 2:23 PM to 3:33 PM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (CXE) [4:22-mj-04277-N/A-MSA] | |
| Monday, February 21, 2022 | ||
| 6 | 6
|
|
| Tuesday, February 22, 2022 | ||
| 8 | 8
|
|
| Friday, March 04, 2022 | ||
| 11 | 11 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Eric J Markovich: Detention Hearing as to Logan Paul McNeil held on 3/4/2022. The Courts notes Pretrial Services was advised the Defendant was deemed unsuitable at Crossroads as the Defendant declined residential services. Defense counsel argues for release. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court orders the Defendant be detained pending trial. Appearances : AUSA Adam Rossi, attorney on duty for the Government, CJA Attorney Stephanie Bond for defendant. Defendant is present (by VTC) and in custody. Interpreter N/A. Hearing held 8:51 AM to 9:13 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SGG) [4:22-mj-04277-N/A-MSA] | |
| 12 | 12
|
|
| Tuesday, March 08, 2022 | ||
| 13 | 13
|
|
| Wednesday, March 09, 2022 | ||
| 14 | 14 IT IS ORDERED the13 First MOTION to Continue Status Conference and Video Depos as to Logan Paul McNeil,Motion Hearing set for 3/10/2022 at 09:20 AM in Courtroom 3B, 405 West Congress Street, Tucson, AZ 85701 before Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera.(LRG)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) [4:22-mj-04277-N/A-MSA] | |
| Thursday, March 10, 2022 | ||
| 15 | 15
|
|
| 16 | 16 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Maria S Aguilera: Status Conference/Motion Hearing re: Material Witness Video Deposition as to Logan Paul McNeil held on 3/10/2022. Defendant consents to appear by video teleconference. Defense counsel states reasons in support of her Motion to Continue Status Conference and Video Depos (doc.13 ). Counsel for the Material Witness objects to a continuance. The Government has no objection. Over the objection made by counsel for the Material Witness, the Court grants Motion to Continue Status Conference and Video Depos (doc.13 ). The Material Witness Video Deposition set for 3/15/2022 at 8:30 AM is vacated and will be continued for a week. The Government is directed to file a Notice of Video Deposition Hearing with the new date and time. Appearances : AUSA Josh Ackerman for the Government, CJA Attorney Stephanie Bond for defendant, CJA Guenevere Nelson-Melby for Material Witness (not present). Defendant is present via VTC and in custody. Hearing held 9:18 AM to 9:25 AM. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (SIB) [4:22-mj-04277-N/A-MSA] | |
| Monday, March 14, 2022 | ||
| 17 | 17
|
|
| Wednesday, March 16, 2022 | ||
| 18 | 18
|
|
| 19 | 19
|
|
| 20 | 20
|
|
| 22 | 22
|
|